| |||||||
| Slavic History and Slavic Migration Slavic History and migrations to the Balkans. 'Macedonism' & the ethnic, linguistic and historical origins of the F.Y.R.O.M |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| Quote:
And besides that you joined those fellas from 41-44 remember only when the Soviets came you chickend out and realised you were going to be incorporated into the Soviet republic so thats when you decided to fight the Germans instead to save your own behind. And also its time you give back the Trebenisthe golden masks and kraters and all other you robbed from Fyrom its not your land nor will it ever be.. You steal history the Peresadyes/Oessaretes/Dessaretes/Encheleans and Pelasgian lake dwellers are not your history but lived hundreds of miles away from your territory, hence you have nothing in common with the artefacts you stole...give em back will ya? |
| |||||
|
[quote=spa05akw;87174] Quote:
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Spercheios http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Kleidion Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I think Bulgaria won against Greece in modern times only in football matches and since you mentioned something about <Peace Treaties and the pressure from the Big Powers that saved your asses in ALL wars> read below whose arse saved the great powers: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_incident_at_Petrich Bulgarians against Germans in WW2?????Where did you see this movie?
__________________ Αυτός τε γαρ Έλλην ειμί γένος τωρχαίον. I am myself a Greek by ancient descend. Alexander I of Macedonia,in Herodotos' book Kalliopi,IX,45. You can fool all of the people some of the time You can fool some of the people all of the time But you can't fool all of the people all of the time. Abraham Lincoln, 1864 Last edited by kostas68; 07-16-2008 at 07:48 AM. |
| ||||
| Quote:
![]() ![]() !!!Quote:
__________________ «Μακεδῶν ἐξ Αἰγιδίου» «...οἶά τε φύλλα μακεδνῆς αἰγείροιο» "...like the leaves of a very high poplar" (Odyssey VII,106) «κακοὶ μάρτυρες ἀνθρώποισιν ὀφθαλμοὶ καὶ ὦτα βαρβάρους ψυχὰς ἐχόντων» "Bad testimonies are the eyes and the ears for persons having barbarian souls" ΗΡΑΚΛΕΙΤΟΣ |
| ||||
|
[quote=spa05akw;87180] Quote:
|
| |||
|
I used to like this thread (with the exception of tankistabg). But the last posts here took the bad language direction again. Although this was not initiated by the Bulgarian side this time, I can not say I'm extremely proud of its response. It is true of course that Bulgaria lost some of its wars and won many of its battles. Most notably in the distant past was the lost war against Basil II "the Bulgar slayer". Then in the recent past a big loss was the second Balkan war, after the magnificent performance during the first Balkan war. I don't think there is a second opinion whether it was or was not a loss. It was not that much a loss coming from the poor performance of the Bulgarian army but one cause by the stupidity of the politicians, some of which were not even Bulgarians. BTW, I will post next some material about the second Balkan war. What happened during that war defined the steps Bulgaria took during the I and II WW and the sides it chose to join. At least this is my opinion. After the Balkan wars Bulgaria was looking for ways to return its lost territories and it sided with those who promised this. Anyone would do this, I guess. It turned against Germany at the end of WW2, after being its ally exactly for the same reason - not to lose more territories after the war as it happened after the WW1. About Prinz Eugen SS devision you can look here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7th_SS_...on_Prinz_Eugen I think that it is not correct to post a map of Bulgaria for year 1265 and use it as a proof of how much Greeks (Byzantium rather) kicked Bulgaria's ass. I can as well put a map here from the time of Tsar Simeon just for you to see how much we kicked some other ass too. Plus the mere fact that on that map of 1265 Bulgaria occupies lands that belonged to Byzantium before speaks quite eloquently by itself. Are you guys sure that those commitas cried "Majka mi" and not "Mamka ti" ? |
| ||||
|
Is spa05akw claiming that the Bulgarians were the Ottoman Empire? He may be right on certain points but he is taking things out of context and using the tried and true strategy of Skopje: convince yourself first and then convince the rest of the world. Although I am hardly an angel myself on the topic of aggressive language, I have to agree that we might be letting this one slip away. Spa05akw, you need to calm down. You're already on the right track by presenting your evidence; you have to expect people will check it out. I for one, am less interested in the rants than I am in the relationship between Greece and Bulgaria; one that seems to be very complicated. I also know and met Bulgarians living in Greece and for all intents and purposes, good, kind people who spoke the language and worked for an honest living. So let's not bury ourselves in vitriol. Present arguments and let's look at them.
__________________ TIME TO TREAT YOURSELF TO SOME GREAT READING. EXPLORE YOUR PAST AND THRILL TO A STORY THAT RESONATES WITH AUTHENTICITY.www.pankration-novel-patrida.com www.fightingbest.com www.bookstandpublishing.com/m/peterkatsionis |
| |||
|
Here are some excerpts about the second Balkan war from the book The True History of the Balkan Wars by prof. B.Dimitrov It is a bit long, but I guess those who are interested will read it anyway:-) The prerequisites for the war between the Balkan allies hide in the extreme reluctance of Bulgarian, Serbian and Greek ruling politicians to back off the already set goals in territorial aspect. Neither one of them was willing to consider the goals of the others, the already signed treaties, the will of the population from the liberated territories... The reason for the Serbian claims to the occupied part of Macedonia was the impossibility to achieve its main goal - access to the Adriatic sea by the accession of North Albania. Austria-Hungary strongly opposed this because it considered North Albania as a zone for its future expansion. The direct war threat played its role. The Great Powers were not ready yet for a world conflict and they exercised their influence over Greece and Serbia.... The chauvinistic Serbian circles at that time considered Kosovo and Sandjak as too small territorial gains for the Serbian efforts during the first Balkan war and made claims over almost the whole territory of Macedonia occupied by the Serbian armies. As argument for not considering the already signed treaty with Bulgaria they stated that Bulgaria didn't send 100,000 troops to help the Serbs in Macedonia as per the treaty. And the Serbs themselves over-complied with the treaty by sending 40,000 troops and 100 heavy artillery for the siege and attack of Odrin (Edirne). Unfortunately, the above is true, although it should not follow from it that 600,000 Bulgarians should live in the Serbian kingdom and the bigger part of Macedonia should be separated forever from Bulgaria. It can only really be regretted that Bulgaria didn't order 100,000 troops into Macedonia, who undoubtedly would had reached Bitola and Ohrid through Stip-Veles-Prilep. The attempt to spill less Bulgarian blood at Odrin on the other hand led to the call for the not-needed 40,000 Serbian troops. Even without them the Bulgarian army had two times superiority in troops and artillery... The Greek claims were fueled by the fact that the Bulgarian government unwittingly refused to make a treaty for the redistribution of the territories in spite of the Greeks insistence for that in September 1912. Taking advantage of the engagement of the Bulgarian forces to the East, of the weak Turkish forces in the Aegean Macedonia and not lastly of the corrupt Turkish commandants of Thessaloniki and Ioannina, almost without casualties (there were 6000 Greeks killed in the first war compared to the 33500 Bulgarian casualties) Greece occupied the territories up to and including Thessaloniki. Taking advantage of the not numerous Bulgarian troops in Aegean Macedonia in April and May, Greek detachments sneaked through the rare Bulgarian lines and took villages in the territories occupied by the Bulgarians. On May 4 one such detachment was met by the Bulgarian troops and although they were less in number, after heavy fighting they completely destroyed the Greeks. This hardened the wide spread opinion in Bulgaria that the Greek army was weak and poorly trained and Bulgaria might not seriously consider Greece. But we have to acknowledge that the Greek claims were not big. Greece wanted to keep Thessaloniki and South Macedonia (which were already occupied by its forces) and to fix the border 20km north of Thessaloniki. In this case Bulgarian territories would had included Kukush (Kilkis), Serres, Drama, Kavala, Voden (Edessa) and in part of those towns there was substantial Greek population. Being afraid of direct clash with the Bulgarian army which numbered 650,000 (the armies of Greece and Serbia together were 600,000) Greece and Serbia signed a secret treaty which had and objective of establishing a common border in Bitola-Resen and common actions against Bulgaria if it took military steps against any one of the sides signing the treaty. Greece and Serbia obliged themselves to offer Bulgaria a border from Gevgeli, south along the Vardar, downt to Kukush (Kilkis) and along a line passing south of the city to a bay north-east of Thessaloniki and in this way the important port of Kavala remained in Bulgarian hands. The Serbs fixed a border with Bulgaria north along the Vardar up to the parallel with Stip and from there along the Bregalnitsa and Zletovska rivers till the Osogovo Mountain. This border in fact completely coincided with the demarcation line between the Serbian and Bulgarian armies in East Macedonia. Bulgaria claimed, of course the whole territory of Macedonia (the disputed and undisputed parts) and Thessaloniki. This was based on ethnographic and historic rights - prevailing Bulgarian character of the population in these areas, the inclusion of this lands in the Medieval Bulgarian state and Bulgarian movements in the recent past - the struggle for independent Bulgarian church (Exarchste) and national liberation (IMORO). The opinion of the Bulgarian population was divided on the question of how to solve the dispute with the allies. The government of Geshov hardly waited for the peace treaty in London to resign due to "health" reasons of its leader. The russophil Danev was elected for prime minister. He sided with that part of the society which insisted for the arbitration of the Russian Emperor, although the Serbian claims were not possible to fulfil in their maximum. Similar to the Romanian case, the Emperor most probably would had divided the occupied by Serbia territories in two along the line Veles-Debar in which case the Northern part with Skopie, Kumanovo and Tetovo would had remained in Serbia and the Southern part with Veles, Bitola, Prilep, Resen, Struga - in Bulgaria. Unfortunately, far louder and numerous was the group in the Bulgarian society which pleaded for the whole of Macedonia and insisted on refusal of the Russian arbitration. Unfortunately, in this group of politicians, military figures and intellectuals was also tsar Ferdinand. The states from the future Entente naturally made huge efforts to preserve the Balkan alliance because in case of a world conflict it would give them 1.5 million soldiers and certain control over the natural resources of South-Eastern Europe. English and French politicians publicly stated that the country which started the war first would be severely punished by the Great Powers which would support politically and if needed militarily the attacked. Russia also joined that opinion and undoubtedly told Ferdinand that in the case of Bulgarian military action would urge Romania to attack Bulgaria. Having in mind that Turkey had not demobilized its army after the London peace treaty it was clear that a Bulgarian action against Serbia and Greece would put her in war with all neighbours and with no political and military allies among the Great Powers. In this situation, even if unwillingly, the Russian arbitration should had been accepted or wait until Greece and Serbia attacked first. It should be mentioned here that both those countries had considered this alternative. Bulgarian forces found with a killed Serbian officer during the first day of the war printed proclamations by the Serbian king for declaring war against Bulgaria and only the date was left blank. On June 15 Danev eventually sent a delegation in St.Petersburg where a Balkan conference would had taken place for the Russian arbitration. At this time Ferdinand did a horrendous mistake which many of his contemporary Bulgarian politicians would qualify as "criminal insanity". The train with the delegation was stopped in Gorna Orjahovitsa...General Savov was ordered to command two of the 5 Bulgarian armies to attack the Greek and Serbian forces facing them. Ferdinand didn't have war in mind but only a demonstration of force which ought to make Greece and Serbia believe that Bulgaria would go all the way and make them more yielding in St.Petersburg. For the governments of the two countries this was a nice gift and they took advantage of it to start large scale war along the whole demarcation line. The war worsened extremely the international situation of Bulgaria. Estimating the value of the warring sides in geo-political and military sense, Russia, Britain and France sided with Serbia, Greece, Romania and Montenegro. Bulgaria didn't get any diplomatic or military help from Austria-Hungary and Germany. They relied even on Bulgaria being defeated because it would repel the country from the Entente states and would include it in the Central Alliance... In the beginning of the war the Bulgarian army had 656000 troops and 2000 artillery...However, close to half of the soldiers were from the Turkish and Gypsy minorities as well as Bulgarians (Christians and Muslims) from the new territories and they did not have the solid military training of the soldiers in the first Balkan war. Well trained soldiers on the other hand had been away from home for 9 months already, they were tired and had lost some of their fighting spirit... The Bulgarian forces were divided in 5 armies...(4 armies against the Serbs) Second Bulgarian army faced the whole of the Greece's army which had two times superiority along the line of Valandovo-Dojran, Tahino lake, Pravishte, Kavala. Second army's fighting ability was decreased because in its ranks were those ill trained soldiers from the minorities... After the London peace treaty was signed the Bulgarian command left in East Thrace only weak militias. Against Romania, in spite of the clear indications that it will enter the war against Bulgaria, there were no forces. ...The attack on June 16 had been devised as a show of force. It was undertaken by the weaker than the respective Greek and Serb forces II and IV Bulgarian armies. But even they were stopped by Gen. Savov after achieving partial success... ...The other three Bulgarian armies entered the war at different times and their actions were hampered further by contradicting orders from Sofia. Fifth army attacked the enemy in the region of Kriva Palanka and quickly defeated the main defences at Chupino. The next day Gen. Kliment Boyadjiev took also the reserve positions at Retki Buki. Panic settled in the troops led by the Serb heir to the throne Alexander and part of them fled to Kumanovo. However, the commander of fifth army Gen. Toshev received an order to withdraw to the border at Gjueshevo where he remained till the end of the war. The movement of third army in the direction of Nis started on June 24 - 8 days after the beginning of the war. Its forces, however, were divided into two - to Nis and to Vranja. After 4 days the army reached Pirot and got an order to stop the advance. After heavy fighting, the group moving towards Vranja reached the goal and also received an order to stop. First army in the direction of Danube after heavy battles reached Knjazevac and came above Nis and Pirot. A little more effort and together with third army Nis and Pirot could had been taken and Serb army in Macedonia cut off. But most unexpectedly first army received an order to withdraw to the border, which it did till June 28. Till the end of the war first army repelled several Serb attacks of Vidin. Big tragedy took place at the front of II and IV armies. Under the pressure from superior enemy forces IV army left Stip and Kocani and fortified on the Kaliman plateau. Two Serbian armies of 5 and 3 divisions and another 10 Greek divisions started to advance against it on July 4. In that 5 day battle the Bulgarian soldier showed once again what he was capable of. Thousands of Serb and Greek soldiers died under the bullets and mortars of the Bulgarians without achieving even a minimal success. 8-th infantry division started a tactical advance on the flanks and occupied strategic heights above the Serbian forces. Weakened, Greeks and Serbs withdrew several kilometers and dug in a defence. II Bulgarian army was attacked by the Greek armies on June 19 at four places along the front - Dojran, Kalinovo, Kukush and Lahana. Bulgarian forces fought heroically. Especially stubborn was the defence of two Bulgarian units at Kilikis (Kukush), 32 km from Thessaloniki. It was attacked by 4 Greek divisions which lost 10,000 killed i.e. more than Greece lost during the first Balkan war. In revenge the Greeks burnt Kukush and expelled its population in Bulgaria. Fierce fightings took place also in Predela and Razlog. The Greek army advanced bravely after the retreating II Bulgarian army along the Mesta (Nestos) and Struma (Strymonas)rivers, overcame the Kresna gorge and reached Gorna Dzhumaya (Blagoevgrad). There, on July 11 the Greek army was stopped at last at the old border. Meanwhile on June 26 the Romanian army entered Bulgaria proclaiming that its only goal was to get "compensations". Against that army fought only local field guards and the Romanians occupy the whole of North Bulgaria, crossed the Balkan mountain, entered the Sofia valley and stopped at Vrazhdebna. The Turks also entered into East Thrace and with unheard cruelty killed thousands of Bulgarians and expelled the remaining population behind the old Bulgarian-Turkish border... In this critical situation the Danev government resigned and on July 4 a new government was formed led by Dr. Radoslavov, and it pleaded for peace. The Romanians insisted that the negotiations were held in Bucharest. Armistice however did not take place. In the meantime, the Bulgarian command planned an operation for encircling and destroying the too much stretched along Struma Greek army which had distanced itself by 150km from its bases. This was decided to happen in the Kresna gorge as the enforced II army engaged the enemy in front of Gorna Dzhumaya while IV army turned around at Kalimantzi and attacked on the flanks along Struma. Than it had to join forces with the Samokov and Rhodopa units which had to take Razlog and the Predela pass before that. The Bulgarian counter offensive started on July 14. IV army took Pehchevo, Negrovo and mt.Zanoga appearing on the hill tops above the Struma. From the East the Bulgarian forces took Razlog and entered the Predela pass, repelling successfully the counter attacks of two Greek divisions. On July 17, II Bulgarian army started advancing in the front. On July 18 six Greek divisions (120,000 soldiers) were completely surrounded. This was almost half of the Greek army which until that moment had lost nearly almost a quarter of its forces. Its destruction in the next 1-2 days raised no doubts. The rear supply units of the Greek army were left behind and part of them destroyed at Krupnik and Breznitsa. Panicking, the Greek prime minister arrived in Bucharest and wanted immediate peace agreement. Bulgarian delegates who did not know about the Kresna victory immediately agreed with relief thinking that the Greek army was continuing its advance towards Sofia. A legend says that a telegram about the encircled Greek army was handed to a Bulgarian delegate but he neglectfully put it in his pocket without reading. But let's be fair. Even if he had read the telegram and had stalled the negotiations and as a result Bulgaria had achieved the full destruction of the Greek army in the Kresna Gorge, the overall critical situation wouldn't had changed much. Romanians were in front of Sofia with no forces to oppose them. The Turks also threatened to advance in the Maritza (Evros) Valley towards Plovdiv. The Turkish navy could devastate at any moment Burgas and Varna. Bulgarian navy ships had fled to Sevastopol and were disarmed there by the Russians. The war was lost. On July 28 in the Romanian capital a peace treaty was signed. It divided Macedonia between Greece and Serbia. The Greeks acquired 34000 square km and the Serbs - 26000. Bulgaria got only the Struma valley down to the Belasitsa and Slavyanka as well as Struma region. Bulgaria also got Western Thrace i.e. the territory between Mesta (Nestos) and Maritsa (Evros) rivers. But it lost South Dobrudza along the line Tutrakan and Balchik. East Thrace was also lost as the Turks returned only the Black sea cost from Kiten to Rezovo, Strandza, the Southern slopes of Sakar mountain and Svilengrad district. As a result of the two Balkan wars Bulgaria increased the territory by 15,000 square km and lost 72,000 soldiers and officers i.e. 5 killed for each sq. km gained. Pessimists asserted that Bulgaria sustained a huge crash of its national ideals. Optimists considered this as something temporary and thought the things could be reversed in the brewing world conflict. Indeed, with its 112,000 sq.km of territory, 5 million population and access to two seas (Serbia, in spite of its territorial gains was still a smaller country without access to the sea) and well trained army, Bulgaria remained the most desired ally on the Balkans by the two blocks of the Great Powers. After the war, the country and the government had to direct their thoughts and efforts towards the almost 300,000 refugees from Thrace, Macedonia and Dobrudza, who didn't have home,property, land and work. Most painfully felt was the liquidation of the church, monastery and school network of the Bulgarian Exarchate in Macedonia and Thrace. |
| |||
| Quote:
There it says they surrendered to the Bulgarians , not that they were defeated by them! And in 45 they were jsut a hand full of men, nothing mentionable.. What are you trying to prove? Bulgaria was a major strategical master like the German armed forces or British army? Besides do you agree with the fact that you Bulgarians should return the Trebenisthe treasures to Fyrom immediately because its not yours nor your culture... Bulgaria is asking for retaliation of the same magnitude...(if Bulgaria doesnt return them i sincerely hope and its already done that your counry is being systematically robbed of its ancient treasures ) |
| |||||
| Quote:
if they weren't attacked by the Romanians and the Turks.History doesn't mention in a war <good> and <bad> guys,only winners and losers,the rest is fairy tales.I think this mr.Dimitrov uses some naive arguments in order to justify every Bulgarian act,especially when he writes that when the Bulgarian king decide to attack Greece and Serbia,he <didn't have war in mind but only a demonstration of force which ought to make Greece and Serbia believe that Bulgaria would go all the way and make them more yielding in St.Petersburg>!Even a child wouldn't say that!I have also some other remarks: Quote:
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() Although Bulgaria had gain lands without any ethnographic and historic right,she wanted also Thessaloniki from Greece.
__________________ Αυτός τε γαρ Έλλην ειμί γένος τωρχαίον. I am myself a Greek by ancient descend. Alexander I of Macedonia,in Herodotos' book Kalliopi,IX,45. You can fool all of the people some of the time You can fool some of the people all of the time But you can't fool all of the people all of the time. Abraham Lincoln, 1864 |