dont you slavic me!!!!

[tankistabg]

Originally Posted by Reaper

So you are telling us, every Bulgarian had to learn a totally new language to speak in from scratch under the Boris I otherwise they were killed?

that is exactly what I am saying and the letter from the pope to Boris confirms it.

[akritas]

tankistabg you have one hour to change your nationalist signature.
And of course you know what I mean.

[tankistabg]

Originally Posted by akritas

tankistabg you have one hour to change your nationalist signature.
And of course you know what I mean.

which part? The anti-slav or the anti-serb.

[tankistabg]

I guess you mean this



but if its not this, just tell me.

[Demetrius Doukas]

Tankistabg,
the only way to fly from the slavs it seems to me is to use Latin or Greek Alphabet, actually throughout the centuries you had the chance but you did not want to use it, so now don't complain so much...........the other way is to use Runic Alphabet and to introduce it in EU,

[akritas]

In Bulgaria, because of the descent of the Slavs, there is a linguistic first of all influence and less racial. Since tankistabg is nationalist and consider the anthropological and genetical views much as ALL the nationlists, lets see what Bulgarians said as about the Bulgarian racial structure

Boev writes

Mediterranean stlzlcture, which is due to a higher percentage of proslavic population and closer encounters with the Mediterranean people. On the other hand, northern Bulgaria, given its closer encounters with eastern Slavic and Proslavic (Skythian and Sarmatic) poprtlations of the Black Sea, is more affected by the Pontian variety of Mediterrenean (more brachycephalic and discoloured)

Consequently northern Bulgaria has a Mediterranean (Thracian) basis, but with an Alpine and Dinaric admixture (brachycrany and broad face), while the relative discoloration comes from the northern Mediterranean Protoslavs. In the 7th century Bulgaria suffered a Turkish-Tatarian invasion, which brought to the country a Mongolian admixture. Bulgaria suffered two other mixtures with the Turktatars.
In the 14th century the Turks brought Tatars to eastern Bulgaria as guards, and at the beginning of the 19th century with Russia's invasion of Bessaravia-a new wave of Tatars entered the country, while tens of thousands of Bulgarians emigrated to southern Russia. These recent Tatarian infiltrations have left strong mongolic-touranic characteristics in the northeastern zone of the country. Popov's extensive anthropological research in 1959 found that there is indeed a series of differences between northern and southern Bulgaria.

southern Bulgaria:

it is more common to find a combination of characteristics that corresponds to the Mediteranean race, a combination that is from the Neolithic period the basis of the population. This combination is found to a large degree in the south. Even more common is the Mediteranean combination in the southeast, that is, in the Thracian Valley, in the Maritsa Valley, and on the shores of the Black Sea.

northern Bulgaria:

But the northern country, though basically Mediterranean, formed the centre of Slavism, since this area was first made Slavic linguistically and in this area the new national consciousness, "the Bulgarian nation", was formed.

Of course Popov avoid to say clearly the Mongolian(Tatarian) influence to the Nortthern people and remain only to the linquistic fact only. So anyone can see that Bulgarians racially is a mix of people. People who are not racially related cannot become nationally related.

As about the name Bulgarians exept the known Volga thory there is and one other one.The theory that the Bourgarioi were people living on the borders of the Roman Empire who guarded the "bourga" (castles), and because of them, those who resided on the shores of the Istros River were called "Burgarians". Indeed, even from +200 the residents of that area were called Burgarians as a Greek inscription found in Phillipoupoli and now housed in the Sofia museum proves.

Tankistabg just remember that stormfront lines are not acceptable in this forum.And as you are a follower of the Bulgarian nationalism dont by-pass it.

[tankistabg]

Originally Posted by akritas

In Bulgaria, because of the descent of the Slavs, there is a linguistic first of all influence and less racial. Since tankistabg is nationalist and consider the anthropological and genetical views much as ALL the nationlists, lets see what Bulgarians said as about the Bulgarian racial structure

Boev writes

Consequently northern Bulgaria has a Mediterranean (Thracian) basis, but with an Alpine and Dinaric admixture (brachycrany and broad face), while the relative discoloration comes from the northern Mediterranean Protoslavs. In the 7th century Bulgaria suffered a Turkish-Tatarian invasion, which brought to the country a Mongolian admixture. Bulgaria suffered two other mixtures with the Turktatars.
In the 14th century the Turks brought Tatars to eastern Bulgaria as guards, and at the beginning of the 19th century with Russia's invasion of Bessaravia-a new wave of Tatars entered the country, while tens of thousands of Bulgarians emigrated to southern Russia. These recent Tatarian infiltrations have left strong mongolic-touranic characteristics in the northeastern zone of the country. Popov's extensive anthropological research in 1959 found that there is indeed a series of differences between northern and southern Bulgaria.

southern Bulgaria:


northern Bulgaria:


Of course Boev avoid to say clearly the Mongolian(Tatarian) influence to the Southern people and remain only to the linquistic fact only. So anyone can see that Bulgarians racially is a mix of people. People who are not racially related cannot become nationally related.

As about the name Bulgarians exept the known Volga thory there is and one other one.The theory that the Bourgarioi were people living on the borders of the Roman Empire who guarded the "bourga" (castles), and because of them, those who resided on the shores of the Istros River were called "Burgarians". Indeed, even from +200 the residents of that area were called Burgarians as a Greek inscription found in Phillipoupoli and now housed in the Sofia museum proves.

Tankistabg just remember that stormfront lines are not acceptable in this forum.And as you are a follower of the Bulgarian nationalism dont by-pass it.

Interesting research. I see it for first time. PS - what is the problem with stating that the origin of the word "slav" is the latin and greek words for "slave". Its a basic fact.

[tankistabg]

Originally Posted by Demetrios Doukas

Tankistabg,
the only way to fly from the slavs it seems to me is to use Latin or Greek Alphabet, actually throughout the centuries you had the chance but you did not want to use it, so now don't complain so much...........the other way is to use Runic Alphabet and to introduce it in EU,

Actually the true 100% Bulgarian alphabet was the Glagolics. It was used mainly in the Bulgarian empire and Croatia. Actually Croatia used it until 1913 when the serbians FORCED them to use latin script...

So glagolics is not a bad choise at all.

[Istor]

Bulgars weren't Slavs. But when they arrived in Balkans, they conquered many Slavs and incorporated them in their own Empire. The Empire was called Bulgarian, after ruling people name, and thus, all its peoples were Bulgarians. Soon, original Bulgarians were assimilated by Slavs. Today, Bulgarians are Slavs.

SlavoSkopians are Bulgarians and thus Slavs. But history made a mistake: at 1912-13 they were conquered by Serbians, instead of being liberated by Bulgarians.

In both countries there is a strong anti-slavic movement helped by Americans. Americans want both countries away from Russian influence.

[tankistabg]

Originally Posted by Istor

Bulgars weren't Slavs. But when they arrived in Balkans, they conquered many Slavs and incorporated them in their own Empire. The Empire was called Bulgarian, after ruling people name, and thus, all its peoples were Bulgarians. Soon, original Bulgarians were assimilated by Slavs. Today, Bulgarians are Slavs.

SlavoSkopians are Bulgarians and thus Slavs. But history made a mistake: at 1912-13 they were conquered by Serbians, instead of being liberated by Bulgarians.

In both countries there is a strong anti-slavic movement helped by Americans. Americans want both countries away from Russian influence.

Hmm.... Let me give you a clue
Russia is the only big contry that supports the macedonists in Bulgaria(a party called OMO ilinden, similar to the Rainbow party)