Shooting Down a U.S. Spy Satellite

[Lakonian]

Shooting Down a U.S. Spy Satellite
by Tom Bowman





NPR.org, February 20, 2008 · President Bush earlier this month decided to shoot down a broken U.S. spy satellite orbiting Earth — before it crashes and spills its toxic fuel.

A Navy cruiser in the Pacific Ocean will launch a heat-seeking anti-defense missile into orbit as early as Wednesday night in an effort to destroy the fuel tank.

Here, the nuts and bolts of the Navy's mission:

Why is the Navy shooting down this spy satellite?

Government officials say they are concerned that the fuel tank could land in a populated area, rupture and turn into a toxic gas. The fuel is hydrazine — which in gas form would be similar to chlorine and could damage skin and lungs. Some experts doubt this rationale, however. John Pike with globalsecurity.org believes American officials worry that pieces of this spy satellite (which takes pictures) could fall into the hands of the Chinese or Russians, who could learn more about how the United States builds these satellites.

What will the Navy use?

Three Navy Aegis cruisers will take part in the effort, though only one will be used to target the satellite, which is about 150 miles up. The missile used is called a Standard missile and is similar to one used in missile defense tests. The Navy has been particularly successful in such anti-missile tests, with about a dozen hits and one miss in the past several years.

How will it work?

The missile will try to strike the fuel tank just as the satellite comes close to the Earth's atmosphere. The Navy expects about half the pieces to burn up as they enter the Earth's atmosphere.

What if it doesn't work?

Pentagon officials say they would try again in a day or two.

What are the chances of debris hitting anyone?

Pretty slim, since about three-quarters of the world is water and a small percent is inhabited. There are about 100 re-entries of space debris each year with few, if any, reports of injuries.

Why did the satellite break?

No one is saying publicly. Shortly after it was launched in December 2006 from Vandenburg Air Force Base in California, the intelligence community lost radio contact with the "imagery" satellite, which essentially takes high-resolution pictures and is about the size of a bus. The satellites cost hundreds of millions of dollars apiece. There are at least several other classified imagery satellites and some commercial ones in orbit.

What is the reaction from other countries?

China and Russia in particular are protesting the mission. They want a treaty that prohibits the weaponization of space, even though China a year ago shot down an old weather satellite, about 450 miles up, to test its anti-satellite missile. Experts like Joan Johnson Freese at the Naval War College say the mission clearly raises fears from both countries about the defensive nature of missile defense. Others say it could embolden these countries to beef up their own anti-satellite capabilities.

Does the United States plan to use the knowledge gained from this project for other endeavors?

The government has not really addressed this — they say the reason they are shooting down the satellite is safety. But many experts believe the United States would be able to glean a lot of information, from its sensors, about how to better use and develop anti-missile and anti-satellite weapons.

Im amazed to see how stupid the American officials think the people are.....perhaps they could be right.

I believe it was just target practice for them and not just a regular missle, thus the excitemnet from China and Russia. America can tell who can and cant posses a nuclear weapon...why? I dont see how the world is a safer place while there surplus, and black budgets are put into WOMD.

Same goes for Russia and China but i never see them do things like this.

I didnt even know America could hit targets at that range and in outer sphere no less! Scary stuff.