Quote:
Originally Posted by GreekSlav You misunderstood me. Yes, they have been taught some of this trash, BUT WE AS GREEKS KNOW THE TRUTH SO IT IS INSIGNIFICANT. WHAT THEY SAY AND BELIEVE ARE JUST PIPE DREAMS. I have never ever in my life, here and there and elsewhere, ever defended their position when it comes to the lies that come from the fanatical Macedonians. Never. You show me where I have defended their pipe dreams, lies and fantasies!! Where? |
From network54 along with a thousand.
Greek Slav (Login GreekSlav)
Makedonija Forum Mods Group
Actually it is much better to call Darius' army - Greek army, since 50,000 Greeks were fighting on Darius' side against Alexander and his Macedonians, while only 7,000 Greeks served as ‘hostages’ the ambitions of the Macedonian king (Green). These hostages, Alexander got rid of only when he learned that the Macedonian occupation troops have a firm control of the whole of Greece, when Antipater finally subdued the Spartans next to the rest of the Greeks. Here are the overwhelming proofs that the Alexander’s army was not a Greek army, and that Alexander did not care about the Greeks, but his Macedonians:
1. "This was the Panhellenic crusade preached by Isocrates, and as such the king’s propaganda section continued - for the time being - to present it. No one, so far as we know, was tactless enough to ask the obvious question: if this was a Panhellenic crusade, where were the Greek troops? Peter Green Alexander of Macedon [p. 157]
2. "The truth of the matter seems to have been that Alexander distrusted his Greek allies so profoundly - and with good reason - that he preferred to risk the collapse of his campaign in a spate of rebellion rather than entrust its safety to a Greek fleet." [p.192]
3. "The burning of Persepolis had written finish to the Hellenic crusade as such, and he used this excuse to pay off all his league’s troops, Parmenio’s Thessalians included. The crisis in Greece was over: he no longer needed these potential trouble makers as hostages." [p. 322]
4. "Of the sixty-five or so men named as hetairoi, 9 are Greek, including 3 mainlanders. Of the nine, four owed their position to life-long connections with Macedon: Nearchus and the brothers Erygius and Laomedon ere in fact raised as Macedonians, and Demaratus of Corinth had been associated with the court since the time of Philip II."
Note: Very small number of Greeks were hetairoi, next to the overwhelming number of Macedonians]
Conclusion:
Alexander's conquest was for the greatness of Macedonia. The Greeks served Alexander only as mercenaries and were assigned low garrison duties after 330. The 7,000 Greek 'hostages' that Alexander took with himself, were commanded by Macedonian officers, and had insignificant role in the Macedonian victorious battles. Therefore, Alexander’s conquest was a Macedonian conquest, not Greek, his empire can only be Macedonian (as it was), not Greek, an empire that was won by the Macedonians, not Greek.
=============================