Quote:
Originally Posted by Draco Here is my assessment of the situation: The meaning of "Greek" has evolved through time. Modern Greeks are based on the Greek-speaking Christians living in the territory in which ancient Greek civilization. Other Christians (like Arvanites and Vlachs) can "join" (i.e. assimilate), but will eventually have to give up their original languages. The church's job seems to be to install a willingness to join in those populations. Greek-speaking Muslims (such as those in the Dodecanese) are not considered Greeks but Turks instead.
I'd imagine the Venezualan's family living in Greece for a number of generations would be required.
The Arvanites did so.
I think the claims to North Epirus are based on the Greek and Albanian-speaking (Arvanite) Christian Greek populations living there.
If no Greek people are living in the relevant area, there can be no claim. Western Asia Minor is an example of this, when there still were Greeks living there, Greek governments sought to annex the region, when they were expelled in the 1920s, the irredentism ceased (except in certain marginal fringe circles). |
Good so issue them visas

We both know it's about land, and greed, in that department, means only problems.
Regarding the Church: it's the old game, win conversions and assimilate. It's a national church, to benefit the nation. Serbia's church called for Russian arms and volunteers for Kosova.
As laws are passed (EU) and other nations pick up on the economy I think it will backfire as people might resent it. Now they do what they have to, baptize, add a -os to the name or whatever. People also added an -ic in Serbia and converted to Islam under Turks. Survival.