| |||||||
| Greek Politics News Issues Forum Greek news, politics and issues forum |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
|
Akritas, Paulos, you are not examining this issue as much as me. Look at my post history. Do you want to know how that Turkish journalists page got translated: http://www.macedoniaontheweb.com/for...-new-post.html On some Greek-Turk forum this Turkish Kurd was posting. Every post that he made, he was attacked for his ethnicity by fanatic Turks and I helped to defend him. Finally he PMed me and offered to help translate any documents from Turkish. So I feed him that page that Tsontos provided and he translated. What he said to me in private was the exact opposite of what he said in front of the Turks, where he was forced to constantly pretend to take the Turkish nationalist positions on issues. I just share this little anecdote so you can understand a little what it means to be a minority in Turkey. To have to constantly lie and be afraid of the Turkish fanatic population. To think one thing in private and to be forced to proved your Turkishness in public. The historian Bat Ye'or coined the term dhimmitude to describe how non-muslim minorities like Christian Greeks lived under the Ottoman yoke. We could not testify in Turkish courts, we had to pay the jiyza to even have the right to exist, there was double taxation, humilatiations, etc. Here is an example of what Armenian Americans recently did: http://www.panarmenian.net/news/eng/print/?nid=23450 Quote:
Look at we Greeks and what we are doing on the contrary. We are misleading and lying to our own selves. We are acting like the Ecumencial Patriarch can be a spiritual leader while being hostage to Turkish interests. In 1955 we should have learned then that the Archdiocese of the Americas can not be under the Patriarch but instead we let Turkey invade Cyprus with still the same problem existing of allowing the hostage of Turkey(the Patriarch) to limit the Greek American response to the Turkish invasion. After Mehmed the Conqueror invaded Constantinople he created the millet system. He made the Ecumencial Patriarch very powerful and this Patriarch was even responsible for collecting taxes and for keeping the Greek flock loyal to the Sultan. This why after Greek rebellions the Patriarch was often killed. Does this mean we should feel sorry enough for our Independence as a nation from the Turks because we went against our spiritual leader, allegedly? This is why a Church of Greece was created. What is embarrasing is to lie to yourself. The Patriarch is everything I described him to be. He cannot act out in Greek interest if he wanted to. Like the Armenians if this Ecumencial Patriarch visits the USA to make propaganda for Turkey, I hope that Greek Americans will oppose him and this situation instead of allow the Turks to degrade and humilate us as a nation with their captive hostage. But instead if I say the truth on the contrary I know many ignorant and religious Greek Americans would rather attack me and let the Ecumencial Patriarch serve Turkish interests so they can hide behind the lie that he can be a spiritual or any kind of leader to Greeks outside of Turkey. Last edited by Nikephoros; 01-11-2008 at 12:34 AM. |
| ||||
| Quote:
Should Nikeforos be banned unless he publicly apologise? What to you think guys?
__________________ "We are Macedonians but we are Slav Macedonians. That's who we are! We have no connection to Alexander the Greek and his Macedonia." From Kiro Gligorov President of FYROM at Toronto Star newspaper, March 15, 1992 "We are Slavs who came to this area in the sixth century ... we are not descendants of the ancient Macedonians." From Kiro Gligorov President of FYROM at the Foreign Information Service Daily Report, Eastern Europe, February 26, 1992, p. 35 |
| ||||
| What is this, a theocracy? The Ecumenical Patriarch is basically a titular bishop who fancies himself as an Orthodox Pope claiming primacy over real bishops with real "flocks". Insulting him is not an insult to all Greeks. Nikephoros's precise choice of words may have been unfortunate, however he makes a legitimate point.
|
| ||||
|
But inappropriate nonetheless. I am not complaining about Nikeforos points of view but about his language. I feel offended by his language and not his point!!! It is outrageous such language. Everybody can make whatever point he wishes thats the point of debating- free speach but always with a respective manner. He must apologises for the use of the world dog and not for his opinion.
__________________ "We are Macedonians but we are Slav Macedonians. That's who we are! We have no connection to Alexander the Greek and his Macedonia." From Kiro Gligorov President of FYROM at Toronto Star newspaper, March 15, 1992 "We are Slavs who came to this area in the sixth century ... we are not descendants of the ancient Macedonians." From Kiro Gligorov President of FYROM at the Foreign Information Service Daily Report, Eastern Europe, February 26, 1992, p. 35 |
| |||
|
This is beyond stupid. Who is bringing to this forum info from books he OCR'd himself and who is making up stupid issues like, "he insulted all Greeks because of what he said of the Ecumencial Patriarch"? When I have time I can scan in some pages from Franz Babinger work on Mehmed the Conqueror. The first Ecumencial Patriarch the Turks appointed was a slave monk that Mehmed brought and installed as Patriarch. Whether you like it or not ever since that day the Patriarch as an instutition, its duty has been more to making Greeks accept Turkish rule than being a spiritual leader. |
| ||||
|
Nikephorus, personally I think your point is valid to an extent. Its probably a more effectively made point without the remark which offended Paulos Melas however. About Bartholomew, isnt it true that in recent times he's been particularly critical of the Turkish government and thats why he's come under attack from Turkish nationalist elements?
__________________ Φωτιά και τσεκούρι στους προσκυνημένους -Θεόδωρος Κολοκοτρώνης |
| ||||
|
Why should be ban nikephoros??Because he questioned the loyalty of a Turkish citizen?
__________________ 'Go tell the Spartans,stranger passing by,that here,obedient to their laws we lie' Thermopylae 480 B.C www.macedonian.com.au |
| ||||
| No. What is beyond stupid is your refusal to retract and apologise. You would much rather offend people than swallow your stupid pride. I'm no fan of Patriarch Bartholomew but I also recognise the difficulty of the position he is in. You, I presume, live in a nation where you have almost complete freedom. You can post whatever you like from the comfort of your armchair with no fear of repercussions. You don't have molotov cocktails thrown in your backyard or rocks thrown through your windows on a regular basis do you. Be a man, retract and apologise. That is something that takes guts and will earn you a lot of respect, or at least regain a little of what you have lost over your recent comments. |