View Full Version : Bitola Inscription
akritas
05-30-2006, 05:39 PM
There are many Historical and archaelogical proofs that show the Bulgarian apearance in the FYROM State
One from the most known is the so called Bitola Inscription.
It mention that the Jovan Vladislav, was the King of the supposing Macedonian State called him self as BULGARIAN EMPEROR.
The following inscription found in the Monastirion (Bitola) at 1956 and they translated only some quotes that mention:
“This inscription was engraved from the Jovan Vladislav,Bulgarian Emperor son of Aaron(brother of Samuil)”
“this castle rebuild for the save and the life of the Bulgarians”
Who told that:
J.Zaiminov,H. Lunt,R. Mathiesen. The only disagreement is the chronology of the inscription. The first said that estimated in 11 cent when the latter’s in 13 cent. But is known that the Skopjans never allowed Greeks or Bulgarians in orders to make any archaeological corporation in theirs state.
http://img114.imageshack.us/img114/3224/bitolainscription7mt.jpg
Amyntas
05-30-2006, 07:19 PM
Is that the inscription that was sealed away after bulgarians saw that it has samodôrûec bôlgarski (bulgarian emperor) on it?
akritas
05-31-2006, 02:28 AM
Is that the inscription that was sealed away after bulgarians saw that it has samodôrûec bôlgarski (bulgarian emperor) on it?
Yeap:)
Tsontos
05-31-2006, 02:52 AM
The Bitola insciption is just another primary source which confirms many figures and events claimed by FYROM as Bulgarian.
Theres more on the inscription in the ethnic origins thread:
http://www.macedoniaontheweb.com/forum/3457-post18.html
akritas
05-31-2006, 06:27 AM
Some usefull academaic sourses regarding the Bitola inscription are :
H.Lunt, "Onthe Slavic Palimpsests",American Contributions to the 4th International Congress of Slaviststs,The Hague 1958,191-209
and
R. Mathiesen, " The Importance of the Bitola Inscription for Cyrillic Palaeography", South-East European journal,21 (1977) 1-2
i have also and the Zaimov but are in Cyrillic and is dificult to me the reading:unsure:
Ptolemy
05-31-2006, 06:33 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitola_Inscription
The Bitola inscription is an inscription made by order of Bulgarian Tsar Ivan Vladislav in 1015 or 1016 in connection with the fortification of the Bitola fortress. The inscription was found in 1956 in Bitola, Republic of Macedonia and is stored at the Bitola Historical Museum.
Text of the inscription (translation from Old Bulgarian):
In year 6253 (1015) since the creation of the world, this fortress, built and made by Ivan, Tsar of Bulgaria, was renewed with the help and the prayers of Our Most Holy Lady and through the intercession of her twelve supreme apostles. The fortress was built as a haven and for the salvation of the lives of the Bulgarians. The work on the fortress of Bitola commenced on the twentieth day of October and ended on the… This Tsar was Bulgarian by birth, grandson of the pious Nikola and Ripsimia, son of Aaron, who was brother of Samuil, Tsar of Bulgaria, the two who routed the Greek army of Emperor Basil at Stipone where gold was taken… and this… Tsar was defeated by Emperor Basil in 6522 (1014) since the creation of the world in Klyutch (the Battle of Kleidion) and died at the end of the summer.
[edit]
References
Бурмов, Александър. Новонамерен старобългарски надпис в НР Македония, Пламък, 3, София 1959, 10, с.84-86
Заимов, Йордан. Битолският надпис на цар Иван Владислав, самодържец български. Епиграфско изследване, София 1970
Заимов, Йордан. Битольская надпись болгарского самодержца Ивана Владислава, 1015-1016, Вопросы языкознания, 28, 1969, 6, с. 123-133;
Мошин, Владимир. Битољска плоча из 1017. год., Македонски jазик, ХVІІ, Скопjе 1966, с.51-61;
Томовић, Г. Морфологиjа ћирилских натписа на Балкану. Историjски институт. Посебна издања, 16, Београд 1974, с.33
Mathiesen R. The Importance of the Bitola Inscription for Cyrilic Paleography, The Slavic and East European Journal,21, Bloomington 1977, 1, p. 1-2
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/80/Bitola_Inscription.jpg
akritas
05-31-2006, 06:58 AM
Something that must take your attentions is that Skopjans cleverly said that the Bitola inscription is the Samuel inscription or stone.Are tottaly two diffrent stones and inscriptions.
admin
06-02-2006, 02:33 PM
Why aren't they proud to show that off? I guess they have something to hide.....
Funny people, even worse government. Lies and deceit.
Amyntas
06-02-2006, 05:47 PM
Is that the inscription that was sealed away after bulgarians saw that it has samodôrûec bôlgarski (bulgarian emperor) on it?
They found something on it they didnt like ;)
struja
06-19-2006, 03:09 AM
Some usefull academaic sourses regarding the Bitola inscription are :
H.Lunt, "Onthe Slavic Palimpsests",American Contributions to the 4th International Congress of Slaviststs,The Hague 1958,191-209
and
R. Mathiesen, " The Importance of the Bitola Inscription for Cyrillic Palaeography", South-East European journal,21 (1977) 1-2
i have also and the Zaimov but are in Cyrillic and is dificult to me the reading:unsure:
1st Warning struja, you just break the N#2 Forum Rule.Banned for one week
akritas
06-19-2006, 03:14 AM
struja say hellow and goodbye
Flipper
06-30-2006, 08:32 PM
What did Strunja say? I'm curious and I need a good laugh...
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.