PDA

View Full Version : Stephen Dushan and Macedonia in 14th cent


akritas
03-03-2006, 12:32 PM
In the last two centuries of Byzantine rule in Asia Minor and the southern Balkans saw the loss of Asia Minor, and the reduction of the empire to a dependency of the growing Ottoman Sultanate. The empire simply did not have the resources to fight on several fronts, and even to fight on one for more than a short period proved an impossible burden. But the empire's strategic position made warfare unavoidable, while the imperial political ideology meant that emperors continued to look for ways of recovering former territory and lost glory.

In 1390 the last fortress in Asia Minor fell to the Ottomans. Part of the empire's failure can be ascribed to the vicious civil wars that were fought between factions of the ruling dynasty: war began in 1321, lasted until 1325, flared up again in 1327, and broke out again in 1341. The Serbian ruler Stefan Urosh IV Dushan (1331-55) soon became involved on one side, while the other hired Turkish mercenaries to help in the fight. The struggle, which exhausted the small treasury, alienated the rural and urban populations who had to pay for it and failed to heal any of the rifts in the elite, ended with the victory of the emperor John VI Kantakouzenos in 1346. John had been supported by a faction of the clergy which had adopted a strongly anti-western view, a view that had important consequences for the last century of Byzantine culture and politics. But politically and economically the empire was in a desperate situation. The Serbs had absorbed Albania, eastern Macedonia and Thessaly, and all that was left of the empire was Thrace around Constantinople, a small district around Thessaloniki (surrounded by Serbian territory), and its lands in the Peloponnese and the northern Aegean isles. Each region functioned as a more or less autonomous province, so that Byzantium was an empire in name and by tradition alone. The civil wars had wrecked the economy of these districts, which could barely afford the minimal taxes the emperors demanded. Galata, the Genoese trading centre on the other side of the Golden Horn from Constantinople, had an annual revenue seven times as great as that of the imperial city itself!

While the Ottomans had been expanding out of Anatolia a different force had been growing in the north to challenge the Byzantine Empire. In 1331 Stephen Dushan ascended the throne of Serbia and spent the next 20 years building up a Serbian Empire. Just like the Ottomans Dushan had taken full advantage of the Byzantine succession dispute to conquer much of Albania as well as parts of Thrace and Macedonia. In 1346 he had himself crowned 'Emperor of the Serbs and Greeks', and invited the Venetians to join him in the conquest of Constantinople. Rumours that he was interested in reuniting the Catholic and Orthodox confessions ensured Papal support for the scheme, but in 1355, just as he was about to set off on a grand crusade, Stephen Dushan died.

Dushan's Serbian Empire rapidly started to crumble after his death, but when the Ottomans occupied Philippopolis in 1363 there was sufficient glory left in the Serbian name to persuade its defeated commander to seek help from that direction. A united force of Serbs, Bosnians and Wallachians joined a Hungarian army under the Hungarian king, Louis the Great, and marched against the Turks at Edirne. But their rapid advance made the crusaders lazy. Less than two days from Edirne they made camp on the banks of the river Maritza and celebrated their progress with feasting. The local Ottoman commander led his predominately light cavalry arm in an ambush by night. The Christians fled across the Maritza, which was in spate, and thousands drowned.

source:
1-Byzantium at War, AD 600-1453 by John Haldon, Routledge, 2003
2-The Ottoman Empire, 1326-1699 by Stephen Turnbull, Routledge, 2003
3-The Byzantium State by George Ostrogorski, Stefanopoulos, 2002

PhiliptheUniterchaeronea
03-07-2006, 05:54 PM
Thanks Akritas. I hope to get to these books.

Tsontos
05-04-2006, 01:28 AM
While the Ottomans had been expanding out of Anatolia a different force had been growing in the north to challenge the Byzantine Empire. In 1331 Stephen Dushan ascended the throne of Serbia and spent the next 20 years building up a Serbian Empire. Just like the Ottomans Dushan had taken full advantage of the Byzantine succession dispute to conquer much of Albania as well as parts of Thrace and Macedonia. In 1346 he had himself crowned 'Emperor of the Serbs and Greeks', and invited the Venetians to join him in the conquest of Constantinople. Rumours that he was interested in reuniting the Catholic and Orthodox confessions ensured Papal support for the scheme, but in 1355, just as he was about to set off on a grand crusade, Stephen Dushan died.


Akrita, can you post the exact reference/ citation for the important statement in bold?

Tsontos
05-04-2006, 01:31 AM
Also, can we have some references about which parts of Macedonia and Thrace were taken from the Serbs and which parts taken from the Byzantines?


I understand that in 1913 the Turkish garrison wanted to surrender Florina and Monastiri to the Greeks because it was the Greeks who they had first taken it from?

akritas
05-04-2006, 11:29 AM
Also, can we have some references about which parts of Macedonia and Thrace were taken from the Serbs and which parts taken from the Byzantines?


I understand that in 1913 the Turkish garrison wanted to surrender Florina and Monastiri to the Greeks because it was the Greeks who they had first taken it from?
The below map is the most accurate that descibe the borders of the Stephan Kingdom.
Give your attentions that Thessalonika and Strymona themes were not parts of the Kingdom but just two administative autonomous kingdom belong in Byzantium and to Serbs

http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/d/dd/Dusanova_Srbija200.jpg

Tsontos
05-04-2006, 09:12 PM
So the Turks did take Monastiri from the Serbs then I suppose..

akritas
05-05-2006, 01:19 AM
So the Turks did take Monastiri from the Serbs then I suppose..
Monastiri occupied from the Turks in 1383 and Skopje 1391. Yes the Turks occupied the Macedonia before the Constantinople fall.

Tsontos
05-06-2006, 02:09 AM
I am surprised the Skops dont claim Dushan like they claim Samoil

Tsontos
04-27-2007, 01:34 AM
Macedonia, or parts of it, were alternatively under Bulgarian or Byzantine rule until the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. Then the county cam under the Serbian Tsars, of whom the greatest was Stephan Dushan, who made Skopje his capital. In 1346 the Archbishop of Serbia took the title of 'Patriarch of the Serbs and Greeks'. But on the death of Stephan Dushan the Serbian Empire broke up. The Turks invaded the Balkans; and in 1371 Macedonia came under Turkish suzeranity.

Elisabeth Barker, "Macedonia, its place in Balkan power politics",
(originally published in 1950 by the Royal Institute of International Affairs), p.8