PDA

View Full Version : Alexander made conscious efforts to hellinize the world


Ptolemy
04-25-2007, 04:23 PM
ALEXANDER ALONG THE SILK ROAD: Alexander made conscious efforts to hellinize the world

Alexander is considered one of the most powerful and successful commanders of all the times. Alexander conquered the Persian Empire, Syria, Egypt, Iraq, Central Asia, and India. He integrated foreigners in his army and followed the policy of fusion. With Alexander conquests, the frontiers of Europe were extended to the entire known world. As a result, the Greeks were exposed to different kind of culture and civilization and it happened at a time, when Greek civilization and literature were at the zenith. The people of Asia were quick to adopt the culture of the conquerors. This situation set the stage to integrate Greek culture in the conquered territories. The artists, painters, musicians and writers flocked to these Modern Greek cities in Persia, Egypt, China and Central Asia. All of these cities followed classical Greek style huge temples and public meeting places.

It is a well-known fact that changes in cultures is the direct consequence of sweeping conquests. When Alexander’s armies subjugated the known world through his military prowess, the result was Hellinization of the cultures in the centuries to come. The impact of this conquest was equally felt from Europe to Middle East and Central Asia. By 323 BC Alexander Empire was stretched from Greece to Egypt, Iran and India. In every conquered territory, Alexander setup a strategic military installations along with Greek style town, such influence can even be observed even in today in Central Asian art and architecture. Despite the enormous distance between the Asia and Europe, the two continents were in contact via Silk Road, which was famous and well-known route for travelers, merchants and pilgrims spreading trade and culture from Rome to Central Asia.

Alexander made conscious efforts to hellinize the world, which can be seen by his marriage to Persian princess, the daughter of Darius III .He also asked 80 of his officers to marry local women. During 324 B.C in a feast he offered 10000 of his men foreign women. Other than that he also built about thirty Greek style cities along the route of his conquest, an extension of Hellenistic empire, which continued long after his death. These cities in later years even though separated from Greek rule remained enclaves of Greek culture. The elite of these cities not only spoke Greek language, but also adopted Greek customs and traditions, including taking part in Greek athletics.

Alexander conquests provided the chance for Hellenism to flourish with much greater force among these territories. Alexander used different techniques to consolidate these conquests. For example Alexander founded the colonial installations, even though some were mere military installations, mainly occupied by army to control the city; but the important aspect of these cities and town was to acquire the status of Greek cities and imitate the Greek style of government. Greco- Macedonians, who lived like Greeks formed part of the local population, ruled these cities. Being conquered, it was natural for these conquered territories to follow the Greek culture and language. One of Alexander’s general Peukestas learned Persian language and became familiar with Persian culture and language.

It was the Central Asia where the Greek foundation can be truly seen flourishing. After the destruction of Bactres in 150 and 120 BC; the new Bactres was a true Greek style city under the name of Eucratidea. The buildings were made of unbaked bricks according to the local tradations, but the city like all Greek cities, it had a theatre, a gymnasium and many fountains. The palace was built on the plain with the courtyard in Greek style. Even the Corinthian decoration and pebble mosaic covered the floor, added with many statues made of stone and clay. The city dwellers even used to speak Greek language as many Delphic maxims were found during excavation. The Greek influences can also be found in Kushan Empire in Central Asia, which was founded around the mid first century C.E. At the time the nomadic tribes accepted the Greek influence, which can be seen in the coins and use of Greek script. The Greek influence also continued to flourish in arts works, even in later Buddhist art and the Gandhara art (Taxila, Pakistan) which carries visible influence of Greco-Roman influences.

Sogdiane region, present day Uzbekistan and Tajikistan was located along the silk route region was enormously influenced by Greek culture. The Greek colonists also laid the foundation of the Samarkand. Even though in the mid second century, the region broke away from the Greek empire, but Hellenism continued to flourish, which in later centuries became an important part of Chinese, Indian and Buddhist cultures. During the first three centuries after Alexander conquest, the Parthian language was heavily influenced by Greek language. And the presence of Greek norms and language was used to communicate with the Greek communities within the kingdom. The Greek artists were also employed to inscribe in Greek language, the evidence of which can be found in the inscriptions on the coins. Many arts objects such as marble, clay sculptures follow Greek ideas. These first Parthian rulers had artists who were familiar with Greek art and style especially casting in ivory, which also includes Dionysian scenes, female poets, and representations of major Greek gods, all of which reflect the highly Greek ideas and influence in their culture.

There is a controversy regarding the view that new civilization was born out of Greek and Oriental cultural interaction. Even though the above discussion makes it clear that eastern cultures were highly influenced by the invasion of Alexander for many centuries and continued to practice Greek norms and cultural practices, but these practices were amalgamated with the local traditions and culture. Some critics mention that both cultures existed independently, which is far from truth, as it is not possible that any culture can live in isolation. Even, if there is no invasion, cultural practices are borrowed and imported. In the case of Alexander, it was the speedy adaptation of Greek culture to become part of Greek elite, which is normal practice followed in all conquered nation. The rule of British in India and French in Africa are vivid examples in present times. The colonial rule has been over decades ago, the language and norms and even the system of government is still colonial, which amply shows that conquerors do influence the ways of a nation.

The foundations of the East West contact were channeled along the Silk route, which were laid in pre-Christian era giving rise to many Asian states. The quest for profit on the Silk Road not only exchanged money and wealth, but also led to exchange of ideas and culture. Alexander was the embodiment of cultural intermingling and during his time and after his death, Greek ideas flowed in poetry, technology and integrated into local culture and traditions. Even though, Silk Road was present before Alexander, but his conquests paved the way for exchange of ideas. After Alexander’s death his empire disintegrated, but this fragmentation did not prevent the movements of goods and ideas across the silk route along the trade. The ruins of monasteries and temples provide the clue to the spread of Greek culture in the Central Asia. These intensive activities of ideas in later centuries gave rise to many movements and religions, such as Buddhists, Zoroastrians, Manicheans and other eastern religions. However, Greek culture was not merely imported and implanted in host culture, but it rather evolved and grew richer in contact with local culture leading to much more dynamic culture in the later centuries.


by Tanvir Orakzai

Tanvir Orakzai is the Editor in Chief of “The Pakthun Post". Tanvir is holding Masters in Literature, IT and doing Doctorate in E-Commerce in Singapore. He has been working as a freelance writer since 1996. Tanvir has been writing on various issues, such as current affairs, foreign policy and economic reviews in various magazines and newspapers. Tanvir is a keen observer of life and like to depict life from a different perspective to his readers.

American Chronicle: ALEXANDER ALONG THE SILK ROAD: Alexander made conscious efforts to hellinize the world (http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=10422)

:clapping: :clapping: :clapping:

Lakonian
05-01-2007, 12:05 AM
Why does he use the term Greco-macedonians?

Overall fantastic article. It would take a monkey though not to pick up that Greece has left its mark all over the world.

pankration
05-03-2007, 01:36 AM
The west is hellenized. No doubt about it.

Truth Bearer
06-07-2007, 09:44 AM
Lets understand something here Alexander the Great was not considered one of the greatest conquerors HE WAS THE GREATEST of all........Documented historically by all historians that under the circustances based on his overall size of his army(small 35,000) against all odds he is the only general/king to go UNDEFEATED in all his battles or wars..........
Genghis Khan was a close second and he had a much larger army (100,000)...

pankration
06-08-2007, 02:17 AM
Unquestionably, EVERY other conqueror pales in comparison. Not only did Alexander cover more territory in his lifetime, he did it without destroying the countries he took over. He also conquered the hearts and minds of the people he came into contact with and considering the time, his benevolence was hundreds if not a couple of thousand years ahead of his time. The naysayers will point to Thebes or Persepolis as evidence of his destruction. But again, for the time, this destruction was minimal and the fact that a man who may have been in one particular region for anywhere from a few days to a few months could 2300 years later still maintain a presence is miraculous. Alexander's generalship is legendary but his personal charisma far surpasses it.
I don't even compare Genghis Khan to Alexander because he never met any of the challenges Alexander did. Khan is better compared to the Persians. Large army, weak opposition and great organization. Keep in mind he couldn't even muster a second fleet to attack Japan when his first one was sunk by a hurricane (Kamikaze). Do you think Alexander would have let a windstorm stop him?

Truth Bearer
06-08-2007, 08:49 PM
Yes Pankration yr spot on Alexander would have never let anything stop him and he would work out away to get what he wants.In regards to Ghengis Khan you must understand that he united all the tribes of Mongolia who were nomads then took on the might of the Chinese who were far too civilised and militarily advanced than those Mongols and the rest my friend is history.
O Megas Alexandros historically has gone down as the greatest of all and as Pankration stated unlike the Mongols that destroyed evrything around them Alexander and his Greek army enhanced the people and that's why the locals accepted them as their rulers for over 300 years thus creating the Hellenistic period.The Mongols sunk without a trace......

Victor
06-08-2007, 09:59 PM
I don't even compare Genghis Khan to Alexander because he never met any of the challenges Alexander did. Khan is better compared to the Persians. Large army, weak opposition and great organization. Keep in mind he couldn't even muster a second fleet to attack Japan when his first one was sunk by a hurricane (Kamikaze). Do you think Alexander would have let a windstorm stop him?

One point: Mongol attacks on Japan happened in 1274 and 1281 when Kubilai Kahn ruled. Genghis died in 1227.

pankration
06-09-2007, 11:01 PM
I should f*ing know better considering that I teach this! Thanks for your prudence with the dates. I should further clarify the Mongols. Genghis was a ruthless warrior who in some ways mirrored Alexander's ability to unite diverse groups into one fighting machine. But his cultural contributions were minimal and his fight with the Chinese was successful because the Chinese themselves were quite divided and encompassed such a large land area that they were incapable of quick and efficient dispersion.
Kublai Khan was the man who did much more to promote the Mongol Empire than his grandfather Genghis. Yes, he attempted to attack Japan and was thwarted by freak hurricanes. Yet it was his hosting of Marco Polo that opened China to the west. I should have said Kublai when making comparisons to the Persian Empire.
My apologies for the earlier mistake; I just got caught up in the emotionalism of the subject. But I stand by my original statement: Genghis Khan was not Alexander's equal. China was not as militarily strong as even the Persians and did not compare to Porus' Indians. Alexander would have made the primary course in Chinese restaurants, SOUVLAKI!!!

Alita
06-10-2007, 08:02 AM
Alexander would have made the primary course in Chinese restaurants, SOUVLAKI!!!

:clapping: Want to know something funny, I actually attended a cookery class yesterday: Greek food was the theme; Asian students were the only participants. They LOVED the food!!! :)

Truth Bearer
06-11-2007, 06:52 PM
You should go to Stalactites in Melbourne to see the kinezi packing it in....

Alita
06-12-2007, 11:33 AM
Mmmmmmmmm... Stalactites... I bet they do! Lonsdale street is becoming a little China now, so I'm not surprised. They have the best souvlakia in Melbourne (there's a good place in Oakleigh but it's been bought by - you guessed it - Kinezous). It's the only place I go to eat where I need to bring a spare lipstick along. :p

Truth Bearer
06-16-2007, 10:29 AM
The koinezoi have taken over lonsdale st.....

Alita
06-16-2007, 10:34 AM
The Kinezoi will take over everything.

Ehetlaios
06-16-2007, 11:37 AM
China will be the number one enemy of the world in 15 - 20 years.