PDA

View Full Version : Macedonia in Geometric Period


akritas
03-05-2007, 12:21 PM
The below are quotes from the book of N.Coldstream; Routledge, 2003 and its title is

Geometric Greece: 900-700 BC

Part 1
The Passing of the Dark Ages C. 900-770 B.C.

page 40

Euboea, Thessaly, Skyros, the Northern Cyclades


At the same time, a number of forms are peculiar to Thessaly, where the pottery has a mixed ancestry. These forms are best seen at Marmariani, in the north. By the beginning of the tenth century, or perhaps earlier still, an intrusive handmade ware had been introduced there, probably by immigrants from Macedonia; the three leading shapes are the beaked jug (with sloping or cutaway neck), the high-handled kantharos, and the cup with trigger handle.

A little later, perhaps c. 950 B.C., these handmade shapes were joined by a full set of wheel made forms imitating Attic Protogeometric, including a fine series of kraters lasting throughout the ninth century. It was from these Attic-inspired shapes that the Sub-Protogeometric style was evolved, in collusion with Euboea. Under this strong southern influence the handmade shapes, too, were soon reproduced on the wheel, and decorated in a hybrid Protogeometric manner (fig. 8d, e).


pages 42-43-44


In another rich grave, Toumba no. 13, the gold (fig. 10) is more substantial: 34 a curious fibula derived from the Mycenaean violin-bow type, but with an ornamental loop at the centre of the bow; a pair of more elaborate earrings composed of two tightly-packed spirals of wire, recalling the northern spectacle fibulae, or the double-spiral finger-rings from Macedonia; a pair of massive finger-rings convex in section; and a more delicate pair with double carination.

In brief: during this otherwise rather bleak period, nowhere else in the Greek world has such an abundance of gold been found. Some of the ornaments-e.g., most of the twenty-odd finger-rings-may have been specially made for the grave, since they do not look solid enough to have been worn in real life; and no goldwork, as yet, shows any obvious sign of Near Eastern sophistication; but it seems likely that the metal, at least, was imported from that direction. 35

The burial customs of Lefkandi represent a curious compromise, unparalleled elsewhere. With few exceptions, cremation was the prevailing rite, from Sub-mycenaean times until the final burials in the later ninth century. The corpse was burnt on a pyre near by, on to which some vessels, jewellery, and dress ornaments were thrown. Afterwards the cremated remains were not placed in an urn, as in Athens ; 36 instead, only a token amount of burnt bones was placed in the open grave together with the unburnt pots and personal belongings, which were sometimes placed as though round an inhumed body. The graves themselves had at first been cists; but from the late tenth century onwards it was enough to dig a simple rectangular shaft in the rock, usually closed with cover slabs resting on ledges.

As one might expect, the main concentration of Early Iron Age sites in Euboea lies in the central plain, dominated at this time by Chalcis and Lefkandi. But a recent survey has shown that there was also a scatter of coastal sites at or near the north-western cape of the island. 37 These would have served as staging-posts on the busy sea route leading from central Euboea into the landlocked gulf of Pagasae and the port of Iolcos.

Thessaly is too large a region to show any uniformity of culture or burial practices. Indeed, two quite independent traditions can be distinguished during the Dark Ages, flourishing at first in different parts of the country. 38 In the south, and especially within the gulf of Pagasae, relations with Euboea had been established well back in the eleventh century. Euboean influence is seen in the entire sequence of wheelmade Protogeometric pottery at Iolcos; and probably also in the adoption there of cist graves with single burials, although the rite preferred in Thessaly was always inhumation, as opposed to cremation at Lefkandi.

In the extreme north, meanwhile, the tholos tomb was the rule, designed for multiple inhumations. The pottery, in the. first instance, was all handmade, in shapes of Macedonian origin; hence it is reasonable to assume that emigrants from Macedonia were among the first incumbents, although the actual form of the tombs must have been inherited from a local Mycenaean tradition. The most informative of these northern sites is Marmariani, where the architecture and contents of six small tholoi have been published in full. A local alternative to the tholos was the rock-cut chamber tomb; at Homolion, still further north, five such tombs have been found as against only one tholos, but all contained multiple inhumations as at Marmariani.

By the middle of the tenth century we have already learned from the pottery that these two traditions had begun to mingle with one another; first the southern wheelmade shapes were copied by the northern potters, who then proceeded to make their own handmade shapes on the wheel, and-in the early ninth century-decorate them in a hybrid manner (fig. 8); meanwhile the northern shapes appear in southern Thessaly, both in handmade and wheelmade form. We must now enquire how far the contemporary burial practices show a similar fusion between north and south.

(diameter 1.60m.) resembling a miniature northern tholos. 39 At Pherae, 15km. inland from the gulf, there are no signs of northern influence in the Geometric cemetery of some forty cists; but an early ninth-century skyphos combines the shape of the Euboean pendent-semicircle variety with the decoration of crosshatched squares characteristic of the northern handmade kantharos.

We have yet to consider Iolcos, the most important site of all, and the most puzzling. A series of forty Protogeometric cists, all with child inhumations, has been excavated within the settlement, coming to an end well before 900 B.C. The latest probably overlap by a few decades the first burials in a tholos tomb at Kapakli near by-a tomb which was to accumulate seventy adult incumbents within the next four centuries. The local custom, so it seems, was to bury children inside the walls, and adults outside. Yet it is hard to accept the tholos as belonging to the local tradition, seeing that two adult cist-burials, of early ninthcentury date, have been discovered at Nea Ionia, less than 2km away from Iolcos; furthermore, the Nea Ionia cists are lacking in the northern pottery shapes, of which there is an abundance in the Kapakli tholos. 40 In view of the other signs of intrusive northern practices in the Pagasae region, perhaps the Kapakli tholos belonged to an immigrant northern clan, who came peacefully to settle in Iolcos, attracted, perhaps, by the greater opportunities there for dealing with the outside world.

From the published evidence, then, one gets the impression of frequent exchanges between north and south Thessaly between 950 and 850 B.C. To begin with, a sophisticated repertoire of Protogeometric shapes was introduced to the north under southern influence. At a later stage some northern forms, handmade and wheelmade, spread to the south; perhaps in the wake of northern immigrants, if we are correct in thinking that the tholos tombs of the north are the oldest in Iron Age Thessaly. Unfortunately, many more of these tholoi cannot yet be precisely dated, since their allegedly 'Geometric' contents have never been published. 41

The rich and extensive tumulus cemetery of Vergina in Macedonia lies beyond the geographical frontiers of this book, except for its exchanges with the Aegean world to the south. In a land where handmade pottery was the rule, the sudden appearance of a local wheelmade fabric, Sub-Protogeometric in its shapes and decoration, must be a sign of southern cultural influence. For most of these wheelmade shapes-low-based skyphoi with pendent semicircles, trefoil-lipped oinochoai, amphoriskoi, and a krater-one need look no further than northern Thessaly for counterparts; and the potters of Vergina, like their southern neighbours, also did wheelmade decorated versions of their own handmade kantharoi and cutaway jugs. Two drinking-vessels, however, indicate direct contact with Euboea; a fine low-based skyphos with full circles, which looks like an import from that source of c. 900 B.C.; and a flat-based glazed cup with a scribble round the lip, a form otherwise known only at Lefkandi. 42 Another skyphos and another cup, both with low conical foot, may perhaps go back into the late tenth century; otherwise, the ceramic influence of the south is confined to the first half of the ninth, with no sign of any subsequent contact until well after the end of the Geometric period. 43

34 AR 1970, fig. 13.
35 On the sources of gold see GDA 313.
36 Except for three urn cremations in the late tenth century, when Athenian influence was strongest. See GDA 196.
37 See the map, BSA 61 (1966), 106 fig. 29.
38 GDA 214-15.
39 The tumulus of Halos, another northern feature, contains nothing obviously earlier than MG, and will be treated in ch. 3.
40 Here I leave out of account the intramural cists, all of which probably precede the diffusion of the northern shapes.
41 i.e., in the north, Chyretiai and Gonnos; in the Magnesian peninsula, Melea, Argalasti, and Lestiani; near the gulf of Pagasae, Sesklo and Dimini; and Ano Dranitsa, in the Pindus foothills. For bibliography see Desborough, PGP 131-2; Snodgrass, DAG 205-6. Reports of cremations in these tombs were considered untrustworthy by Heurtley and Skeat, BSA 31 (1930-31), 12.
42 See p. 40 n. 22.
43 However, remoter Macedonian centres-e.g., Chauchitsa in the Axios valley-went on imitating the pendent-semicircle skyphos with overhanging rim until well into the eighth century: see PGP 190-2 pl. 24b.


page 51

In comparison with the previous period, there is also some evidence of a decline in trade and communications within the Aegean. Around 950 B.C., Athenian Protogeometric pottery had been widely exported, and imitated in places as far distant as Marmariani, Smyrna, Miletus, and Knossos; and also in Cos and Rhodes, where the style was perhaps introduced at second hand through settlers from the Argolid. By contrast, the EG pottery of Athens was hardly exported at all, and found virtually no imitators except in the neighbouring lands-the Corinthia, the Argolid, and Boeotia. Meanwhile, Crete and the Dodecanese were left to develop their own local styles in their own ways; yet the style with the widest circulation was undoubtedly the Sub-Protogeometric of Euboea, spread abroad to Thessaly, Skyros, and the northern Cyclades, with offshoots in Macedonia and Boeotia. However little commerce there may have been elsewhere, the Euripus channel must have continued to be a busy thoroughfare for sea traffic.


pages 87-88

To judge from the only datable finds, i.e., the Atticizing wheelmade pottery (mainly skyphoi, kraters, and plates), the burials extend over about two generations, in the early and mid-eighth century. Some oinochoai are still painted in a lingering Sub-Protogeometric style, but most are undecorated and almost fully glazed. Alongside these southern Geometric forms, two northern shapes are introduced-kantharoi and cutaway jugs; both are wheelmade, undecorated, and covered with glaze. Like the pyres, cairns, and tumuli, they are new to Halos at this time. The squat form of the jugs, which usually have two warts on the shoulder, looks like a local rendering of a handmade Macedonian form. For the burial customs, no other site offers an exact parallel; but cairns with swords are found at Vitsa in the Epirus, cairns and tumuli at Chauchitsa in Macedonia while at Vergina there are tumuli with cremations-in this case in urns-and a similar range of iron weapons. So, from this accumulation of novelties at Halos it appears that a further band of northerners, men and women, made their way into the Pagasaean coastlands around 800 B.C. 29 (http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=107968190)

29 (http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=107968173)N.G.L. Hammond, A History of Macedonia i.403-4.



page 103

These exchanges may have had the effect of consolidating the unity of the Greek world; in communication with non-Greeks, however, there is not much sign of any corresponding progress. Here the most striking achievement is that of the Euboeans, who were making their first moves towards the west coast of Italy soon after 800 B.C. (p. 223 ff.); yet, nearer home, they seem to have lost interest in Macedonia. 66 (http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=107968191)And, in spite of the foundation of Al Mina, there is a curious stagnation in dealings with the Levant. Considerably fewer Levantine imports come to Greece than in the mid-ninth century, and the overt symptoms of wealth in this period are largely confined to four Attic graves, and one tholos tomb at Knossos. This recession may be partly due to reverses suffered by the most active trading powers. The merchants of Phoenicia were no doubt hampered by Assyrian depredations, followed by the hostility of the Aramaean states-although their colonial kinsmen at Kition would hardly have been affected. In Euboea there are hints of internal discord in the MG I destruction at Lefkandi, followed by the diminution of the settlement and the foundation of Eretria; and across the water, the migration of well-armed northerners to Halos may not have been propitious for Euboean trade with Thessaly. At all events, the few Greek sherds of this period from Al Mina seem to be Cycladic rather than Euboean, as are most of the other exports to the Near East. Attic pottery does not reappear there until well into MG II, and it is then that Levantine trinkets begin to reappear in Greece, probably conveyed as before in Phoenician boats. The impression that very few Greeks settled at Al Mina before 750 B.C. is confirmed by complete silence about the place in Greek tradition, which usually records the name of an oikistes, or at least the home of the founders, for any overseas settlement that could be claimed as a colony. 67 (http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=107968191)

66 (http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=107968188)A pendent-semicircle skyphos occurs in an eighth-century context at Chauchitsa in the Axios valley (BSA 26 (1925-26), 10 fig. 30); but its heavy overhanging lip suggests a local derivation from ninth-century Vergina, and not from the contemporary low-lipped form of Euboea.
67 (http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=107968188)Herodotus (iii.91) mentions a colony on the Syrian coast at Poseideion, founded by Amphilochos of Argos on this return from the Trojan War. Poseideion was once identified with Al Mina (Dunbabin, GEN 25-6); but is now more reasonably associated with Tell Basit, an emporium near by which preserves the ancient name, and where recent excavations have produced Greek pottery going back to the tenth century.


.............

akritas
03-05-2007, 12:41 PM
Part 2
The Greek Renaissance c. 770-700 B.C

page 175

From Olympia comes a good specimen of the Corinthian bird pendant, fig. 58a. 28 The elegant curve of its body ends in a duck's bill, and in an upturned tail horizontally hammered out; legs are omitted, the body being joined by a short bulbous stem to a disc (as here) or to a small pyramidal stand. A later and more exotic variant resembles the farmyard cock; 29 its huge tail and crest, hammered out flat in a vertical plane, are covered with incised double circles. The body is hollow-cast, a technique not generally known to the Geometric smith; although a LG context has been claimed for a primitive imitation at Delphi, 30 it may be that none of these cocks precede 700 B.C. The type was subsequently taken up in Argos, Sparta, Thessaly, and Macedonia.

30 Rolley, FD V.2 88-9 no. 146.

page 184
The smaller Geometric offerings at Aetos, other than pottery, were brought from all points of the compass: amber beads and other ornaments, shipped from Italy or down the Adriatic; amulets in the form of miniature bronze vessels, such as were made in Macedonia; stone scaraboid seals from Cilicia; and a granulated gold finial from Crete, in the form of a snake's head (p. 103, cf. fig. 32a). As with the pottery, however, Corinth was the chief supplier; hence come nearly all the ivory seals (most after 700 B.C.) and a handsome group of hammered bronze horses. Yet the most impressive bronzes were found in the Polis Cave sanctuary, where a fine series of tripod cauldrons was dedicated. Before the offering of the first cauldron, the cave had already accumulated some late Mycenaean and early Protogeometric pottery, but nothing obviously votive; but from the eighth century onward the cult continued without break into Roman times, becoming associated with the local Nymphs, and with Odysseus, the local hero (p. 347).

page 186

The most informative site in the Epirus is the settlement and cemetery of Vitsa Zagoriou, situated some 1,000m. up in the Pindus range. A bronze LG horse of Corinthian appearance is the only Geometric find so far published from the settlement. Well over a hundred graves have been opened in the cemetery, ranging in date from the early eighth century into Classical times. All the burials are fully extended inhumations in earth-cut pits, or in various kinds of cist. The importation of Corinthian pottery begins well back in MG II-perhaps as far back as the earliest use of the cemetery-and continues without break into the seventh century. The only other wheelmade vases are a West Greek LG kantharos, and a cutaway beaked jug of Thessalian character with festoons of vertical zigzag on the shoulder; there is no reason to date this vase earlier than than the eighth century. The local ware is all handmade, often bearing simple rectilinear patterns in matt paint; a similar fabric is known in western Macedonia, 81 and isolated examples of it have turned up as far south as Agrinion and Calydon. Most eighth-century graves at Vitsa are rich in metal offerings; the men are exceedingly well armed with swords, spearheads, knives, and-in one case-a bronze shield boss (gr. 34). Women may be supplied with fibulae (usually of the spectacle type), pins (often with roll-tops), spiral bracelets, and necklaces of beads in various materials including rock-crystal, glass, and gilt bronze; there is also a massive bronze diadem in gr. 113 with a circle design in repoussé dots, which has a counterpart at Aetos in Ithaca. 82

81 K. Romiopoulou, BSA 66 (1971), 353 ff.
82 AD 23 (1968), B pl. 233b; cf. BSA 48 (1953), pl. 69, E 243a.


pages 191-192

For Boeotia and Thessaly the evidence is far less satisfactory. From Thessaly, indeed, hardly any LG pottery has been published; but two sanctuaries are well provided with bronze votives, whose affinities are as much with Macedonia as with any southern centre. A Boeotian LG style has for long been apparent in a large corpus of pots and fibulae, mostly from clandestine excavations; happily, during the past decade, the shortage of well-documented finds is beginning to be remedied. Finally, the Cyclades provide a rich variety of styles and materials. In painted pottery alone, four distinct local LG schools can be located in different
islands: Melos, Thera, Naxos, and perhaps Paros. As for other kinds of evidence almost every island has something individual to offer. Thus Tenos specialized in making coarse pithoi, decorated with ambitious figured scenes in relief; Melos is an important source of early stone seals. On Andros a complete stone-built town of the eighth century is coming to light, and some houses have been excavated on Siphnos. Thera is remarkable for its funerary architecture. On Keos a half-forgotten Bronze Age cult was revived in LG times; but by far the most important sanctuary is on Delos, which now begins to receive a wide variety of offerings from all round the Aegean.


page 209


In Macedonia our main concern is with southward communications. During LG times the evidence is slender, and points mainly towards Thessaly; there are resemblances in the handmade pottery of the two regions, a few Types VI and VII fibulae came to Macedonia, 62 and we have noted the incipient vogue for Macedonian bronze ornaments among the votives at Thessalian sanctuaries. Exchanges with southern Greece are much rarer. Of Corinthian type are a bronze pin from the upper Vardar valley (p. 186 n.84), a bronze horse at Pateli near Florina, 63 and another from Chauchitsa; 64 a Type VIII fibula is said to come from Chalcidice. 65 The only certain imports of Geometric pottery are from the mound of Nea Anchialos near Salonika, a little way inland from the Thermaic Gulf. 66 Hence came a deposit of c. 770-750 B.C., including a Thessalian plate and kantharos, and some Atticizing pieces of fine quality (skyphoi, kantharoi, and an amphora neck) which could well be Euboean. Perhaps they were brought by Eretrian prospectors in an area settled by their compatriots some fifty years later; for across this gulf lies Methone, the colony which, according to Plutarch, was eventually founded by those unfortunates who had already been ousted from Corcyra by the Corinthians, only to be rebuffed by the Eretrians at home (p. 200). Methone, however, remains unexcavated, as are Mende and Torone, the early Euboean colonies in the Chalcidic peninsula; so far, then, we have no archaeological confirmation of any Greek colonial settlement in the northern Aegean 67 prior to the Parian foundation of Thasos in c. 680 B.C.

62 Bouzek, op. cit (p. 207 n.59) 130 ff.
63 W.A. Heurtley, Prehistoric Macedonia (Cambridge, 1939), 240 fig. 112m; perhaps another in Tumulus 56a at Vergina, AD 18 (1963), B pl. 259b.
64 FHS 72(1952), 119.
65 Amandry, Coll. H. Stathatos I (Strasbourg, 1953), fig. 32 bottom left.
66 AD 20 (1965), B 421-2, pls. 471b, c (Thessalian), 472a, b (Euboean?).
67 For a helpful appraisal of the literary data see A.J. Graham, JHS 91 (1971), 46-7.


.........

akritas
03-05-2007, 12:56 PM
Part 3
Life in Eighth-Century Greece

page 379


Further north, we enter regions where most of the local pottery is plain and handmade, painted and wheelmade Geometric vessels being exceptional; any external inspiration at this time came from Euboean SPG, seen especially in the ubiquitous pendent-semicircle skyphoi and local imitations. In Pieria, Euboeanstyle SPG shapes, always outnumbered by local handmade ware, keep company with the rich and varied metal offerings in recently excavated tumulus cemeteries at Vergina and Dion. At the head of the Thermaic gulf, the tableland settlement of Sindos-Nea Anchialos received southern imports, some Euboean SPG, others-exceptionally in Macedonia-Attic, or of Atticizing character; 37 processing of gold, attested there from at least 800 onwards, must have attracted Euboean and other traders from the south.


37 M. Tiverios in Euboica 250f., figs. 10, 11.
38 AGC 3off., fig.2. 14a-b (Torone).
39 AEMTh 2 (1988) 360.
40 Snodgrass, AION N.S.1 (1994) 91; Hammond, BSA 90 (1995) 311-12; Euboica 267-8 nn.68, 71 (further refs.). For a sceptical view see J. Papadopoulos, OJA 15 (1996) 151-81.



pages 384-385


The finds of recent years have sharpened the contrasts between the more progressive Aegean centres open to eastern exchanges, and the 'darker' regions of the Greek mainland, still isolated from both eastern and Aegean links. Among the latter, much progress has been made in defining DA ceramic sequences in the southern Peloponnese, but material is still regrettably scarce in Elis, Achaea, Aetolia and Acarnania. Crete, and to a lesser extent the Dodecanese, benefited from eastward contacts without any need for overseas initiative, being well sited on westward shipping routes for visitors from the Levant. No such geographical advantage was enjoyed by the Euboeans, whose active commercial enterprise is attested by a ceramic koinē 74 (http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=107968472)leaving its mark over a wide coastal area extending from Boeotia to Macedonia; starting well back in the eleventh century, it was still widespread in the SPG style of the ninth. Eventually it gave ground to a briefer koinē influenced by Attic MG, which also embraced the northeast Peloponnese, the Cyclades and central Crete-and, indeed, Euboea too.

74 Sakellarakis, AE 1987, 251, fig 11.


pages 414-415


Epilogue

On two important topics, recent discoveries and research have greatly enhanced our understanding of Geometric Greece: one external, the other internal.



In some mainland areas, especially those where full publications have been rare, 'dark' may still be appropriate for their archaeological record before the middle of the eighth century; but detailed ceramic study in Messenia and new finds reported from Macedonia have helped to cast light on areas where the record was previously in deep obscurity. By contrast, archaeologists who have been working in Crete and, especially, Euboea have become impatient of a supposed Dark Age, citing fresh evidence of exchanges with the Near East, almost unbroken since the end of the Bronze Age. These exchanges must in part be related to the gradual expansion of Phoenician commerce throughout the Mediterranean, of which much new knowledge has been acquired; but, on the Greek side, the positive initiative of the Euboeans has received much emphasis. It may be thought that the miraculous discovery at Lefkandi of several rich and unplundered cemeteries, with their copious orientalia, may have caused us to exaggerate the Euboean achievement at the expense of other Greek regions where conditions of recovery have been much less favourable. Athens, for example, was the source of the most admired and influential school of pottery, and has produced a few impressively rich graves with Levantine imports (pp. 55-61) contemporary with the latest from Lefkandi; but these are lucky finds in their context, from areas much despoiled and damaged under later structures in a city which, unlike Lefkandi, was to enjoy a glorious future. Even so, discoveries in Euboea did bring to light the regional ceramic style that is by far the most frequent among exports to Cyprus, Tyre and the north Levant.



For the rise of the Greek city state, one need no longer lament that 'the material record may never shed much light on this topic' (p. 369). An inaugural lecture delivered in 1977 49 encouraged a more optimistic approach. Since then, virtually all the developments treated here in Part III have been associated in various ways with the emergent polis: as a prime cause, the rapid growth of population in an age of increasing prosperity; as significant symptoms, the building of urban temples, the rise of rural sanctuaries, the institution of state cults for local heroes and, of course, the revival of writing, essential in the administration of a polis for communication beyond word of mouth and earshot. But let us not lose sight of the central definition implied by Aristotle-the union of disparate villages to form a coherent city-for which the patient archaeological fieldwork of many decades can now produce some confirmation, as a process already well advanced in Athens, Corinth, Argos and the Cyclades by the end of the Geometric period. There were, of course, routes to the polis other than the Aristotelian: in Crete, where an urban nucleus could be preserved from Late Minoan times; and in the western colonies, where the first colonists organized themselves in poleis from the start. For those parts of Greece where organisation by ethnē still prevailed, much research remains to be done. 50

A burgeoning interest in the Geometric period, and more generally in the Early Iron Age, has been evinced during the past 25 years by numerous international conferences devoted to those times, whether archaeological, quasi-historical, or quasi-religious. Let us hope that this lively interest will bear solid fruit in the full presentation of many important but as yet unpublished excavations.


49 Snodgrass, op. cit. (p. 408 n.17).
50 See, however, C. Morgan, Early Greek States beyond the Polis (London, 2003, forthcoming).


.......................